Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geosphere Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geosphere; February 2006; v. 2; no. 1; p. 53-60; DOI: 10.1130/GES00027.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, K.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geoinformatic approach to global nepheline syenite and carbonatite distribution: Testing a Wilson cycle model

Kevin Burke1 and Shuhab Khan1

1 Department of Geosciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-5007, USA

The association of alkaline igneous rocks and carbonatites (ARCs) with intracontinental rifts has long been recognized. Deformed alkaline rocks (such as nepheline syenites) and carbonatites (DARCs), which form a small subset (<10%) of ARCs and carbonatites, have become a focus of attention since it was recognized that in some places they are associated with suture zones marking locations where oceans have closed. The association of DARCs with sutures can be readily understood in terms of the operation of the Wilson cycle in the opening and the closing of ocean basins. The Wilson cycle hypothesis for the origin of DARCs has been tested for the Proterozoic of both Africa and India. For Africa, an additional hypothesis that we have also tested is that ARCs in intracontinental rifts represent magmas made by partial melting of DARC material in the underlying mantle lithosphere. A limitation of the African and Indian studies is that they are local and regional. Only a worldwide geoinformatic study can fully test the two hypotheses. If one of the hypothesis can be invalidated that will have profound petrogenetic significance. In this study, we describe our ongoing geoinformatic work on the worldwide distribution of ARCs and DARCs, including the databases, techniques, and operating procedures. To illustrate our approach, we report on a local analysis that we have carried out on the ARCs and DARCs of the Kola Peninsula in Arctic Russia.

Keywords: geoinformatics • deformed alkaline rocks • carbonatites • Kola Peninsula







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America