Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geosphere GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geosphere; April 2006; v. 2; no. 2; p. 88-101; DOI: 10.1130/GES00031.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koonce, J.E.
Right arrow Articles by Stetzenbach, K.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geochemical interpretation of groundwater flow in the southern Great Basin

J.E. Koonce1, Z. Yu*,2, I.M. Farnham3 and K.J. Stetzenbach4

1 Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada–Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA
2 State Key Laboratory of Hydrology–Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
3 S.M. Stoller Corporation, 7710 W. Cheyenne Ave., Las Vegas, Nevada 89129, USA
4 Harry Reid Center for Environmental Studies, University of Nevada–Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA

The study of geochemical processes and integrated water flow can help identify groundwater sources and improve predictions of contaminant fate and transport in groundwater systems. Understanding groundwater flow paths in and around the Nevada Test Site (NTS) is important due to the possible migration of contaminated groundwater to the neighboring communities. A total of 118 groundwater samples from the NTS and surrounding area (e.g., Oasis Valley, Ash Meadows, Death Valley, the Spring Mountains, and Pahranagat Valley) were collected and analyzed for trace elements and major solutes. Cluster analysis and principal component analysis (PCA), along with geographical information systems (GIS), were used to interpret the resulting hydrogeochemical data. Cluster analysis was used to group the ground-water samples into four major clusters. PCA was used to reduce the data into three components that describe differences in ionic strength, groundwater compositions, reflecting interaction with volcanic and/or carbonate rock aquifers, and redox characteristics. Twelve potential flow paths, characteristic of those reported in earlier studies, were identified.

Keywords: geochemistry • groundwater • cluster analysis • principal component analysis • flow path







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America