Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geosphere Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geosphere; February 2008; v. 4; no. 1; p. 1-35; DOI: 10.1130/GES00122.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Table S1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henry, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Ash-flow tuffs and paleovalleys in northeastern Nevada: Implications for Eocene paleogeography and extension in the Sevier hinterland, northern Great Basin

Christopher D. Henry*,1

1 Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA

Northeastern Nevada is generally interpreted as an area of large-magnitude Eocene extension possibly due to gravitational collapse of crust thickened during the Sevier orogeny. The extensional interpretation is based in part on the presence of widespread Eocene conglomerates and lacustrine basins, as well as on thermochronology-based evidence of major Eocene cooling and uplift of the Ruby Mountains–East Humboldt Range core complex.

The distribution of 45–40 Ma ash-flow tuffs and interbedded coarse conglomerates and lacustrine deposits, however, indicates they were predominantly deposited in a system of east-draining paleovalleys incised into a plateau or moderate-relief upland. A large, contiguous sedimentary basin probably was never present. Paleovalleys were as much as 10 km wide and 500 m to possibly as much as 1.6 km deep, based on the thickness of intra-valley deposits. Ash-flow tuffs are widely distributed near source calderas but are almost entirely confined to the paleovalleys as little as 20 km from their source. Basal, mostly pre-volcanic conglomerates contain clasts up to 6 m in diameter. The clasts are well rounded, indicating significant fluvial transport, not derivation from nearby fault scarps. Lacustrine deposits also are restricted to paleovalleys and accumulated during two periods that are interpreted to coincide with episodes of minor, northwest-directed extension, one before 41 Ma and possibly as old as 46 Ma, and another between 40 and 38 Ma. Extension formed small displacement, northeast-striking, mostly down-to-the-northwest faults that temporarily dammed the paleovalleys to form lakes. Lakes probably also formed where volcanic rocks or landslides dammed paleovalleys, a common process both in the Eocene and historically in the western United States. The absence of major Eocene extension suggests that gravitational collapse of overthickened crust, even assisted by thermal weakening of lithosphere by intense magmatism, was not sufficient to generate major extension.

Absolute elevation of the high plateau is uncertain, but it was high enough to have paleovalleys as much as 1.6 km deep. Based on published paleoflora data, interfluves could have been at elevations of ~4 km.

The Eocene paleovalleys in northeastern Nevada most likely drained eastward to remnants of the Uinta basin. An approximately north-south paleodivide through northeastern Nevada separated these east-draining paleovalleys from paleovalleys that drained westward to the Pacific Ocean.

Keywords: paleogeography • extension • Eocene • ash-flow tuff • Nevada




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ajsHome page
S. J. Davis, H. T. Mix, B. A. Wiegand, A. R. Carroll, and C. P. Chamberlain
Synorogenic evolution of large-scale drainage patterns: Isotope paleohydrology of sequential Laramide basins
Am J Sci, September 1, 2009; 309(7): 549 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
C. D. Henry
Uplift of the Sierra Nevada, California
Geology, June 1, 2009; 37(6): 575 - 576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
N. J. Van Buer, E. L. Miller, and T. A. Dumitru
Early Tertiary paleogeologic map of the northern Sierra Nevada batholith and the northwestern Basin and Range
Geology, April 1, 2009; 37(4): 371 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
S. J. Davis, A. Mulch, A. R. Carroll, T. W. Horton, and C. P. Chamberlain
Paleogene landscape evolution of the central North American Cordillera: Developing topography and hydrology in the Laramide foreland
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2009; 121(1-2): 100 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J.C. Fosdick and J.P. Colgan
Miocene extension in the East Range, Nevada: A two-stage history of normal faulting in the northern Basin and Range
Geological Society of America Bulletin, September 1, 2008; 120(9-10): 1198 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
Z. J. Gonsior and J. H. Dilles
Timing and evolution of Cenozoic extensional normal faulting and magmatism in the southern Tobin Range, Nevada
Geosphere, August 1, 2008; 4(4): 687 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
K. Lund
Geometry of the Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic rift margin of western Laurentia: Implications for mineral deposit settings
Geosphere, April 1, 2008; 4(2): 429 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
A. R. Wallace, M. E. Perkins, and R. J. Fleck
Late Cenozoic paleogeographic evolution of northeastern Nevada: Evidence from the sedimentary basins
Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 36 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America