Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Files Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shea, T. Articles by van Wyk de Vries, B. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Structural analysis and analogue modeling of the kinematics and dynamics of rockslide avalanches

¹ Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France

Correspondence: *Shea, corresponding author: present address: Geology and Geophysics Department, SOEST, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, USA; tshea{at}hawaii.edu. van Wyk de Vries: b.vanwyk{at}opgc.univ-bpclermont.fr.

We present a structural analysis of subaerial natural and analogue rockslide avalanches. Such deposits often have well-developed faults, folds, and hummocks. These structures can be used to determine the kinematics and dynamics of emplacement. Large-scaleterrestrial rockslide avalanches show large runout distances compared to their fall height. Most attempts to explain this phenomenon invoke uidizing mechanisms or lubricating agents to reduce forces opposed to momentum, especially at the base. However, the properties and mechanics of low friction are still poorly understood. Any model for motion and emplacement must integrate geometric, morphologic, and structural features, all crucial in constraining kinematics and dynamics. Here we first examine the morphological and structural features displayed by 13 natural rockslide avalanche deposits; we then use simple and well-constrained analogue models involving the slide of stratified granular material down smooth, curved ramps. These differ from previous analogue models in that we concentrate on observing the structures produced by brittle deformation and use a low-friction sliding surface. Models show that variations in the sliding surface curvature, lateral profile, roughness, and modifications in material cohesion can successfully reproduce the majority of rockslide-avalanche deposit features. After discussing the geometrical and dynamic similarity between experiments and natural examples, we propose a model for structure formation and a fourfold classification based on model and natural deposit morphology and dynamics: hummocky, nonhummocky, dominantly extensional, and dominantly compressional rockslide avalanches. The models require a brittle core and surface that spreads and contracts by adjustment on large numbers of faults that bottom into a low-friction décollement layer. Spreading is accommodated by normal and strike-slip faults, while on deceleration, thrust faulting generates thickening. To be realistic, any physical predictive model must take into account these fundamental kinematic and structural aspects.

Keywords: rockslide-avalanche deposits • structures • faults • analogue modeling • avalanche transport • kinematics • hummocks