Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geosphere Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geosphere; February 2006; v. 2; no. 1; p. 53-60; DOI: 10.1130/GES00027.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, K.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ARTICLES

Geoinformatic approach to global nepheline syenite and carbonatite distribution: Testing a Wilson cycle model

Kevin Burke1 and Shuhab Khan1

1 Department of Geosciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-5007, USA


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOINFORMATIC APPROACH TO ARC...
 ARCS AND DARCS OF...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES CITED
 
The association of alkaline igneous rocks and carbonatites (ARCs) with intracontinental rifts has long been recognized. Deformed alkaline rocks (such as nepheline syenites) and carbonatites (DARCs), which form a small subset (<10%) of ARCs and carbonatites, have become a focus of attention since it was recognized that in some places they are associated with suture zones marking locations where oceans have closed. The association of DARCs with sutures can be readily understood in terms of the operation of the Wilson cycle in the opening and the closing of ocean basins. The Wilson cycle hypothesis for the origin of DARCs has been tested for the Proterozoic of both Africa and India. For Africa, an additional hypothesis that we have also tested is that ARCs in intracontinental rifts represent magmas made by partial melting of DARC material in the underlying mantle lithosphere. A limitation of the African and Indian studies is that they are local and regional. Only a worldwide geoinformatic study can fully test the two hypotheses. If one of the hypothesis can be invalidated that will have profound petrogenetic significance. In this study, we describe our ongoing geoinformatic work on the worldwide distribution of ARCs and DARCs, including the databases, techniques, and operating procedures. To illustrate our approach, we report on a local analysis that we have carried out on the ARCs and DARCs of the Kola Peninsula in Arctic Russia.

Keywords: geoinformatics • deformed alkaline rocks • carbonatites • Kola Peninsula


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOINFORMATIC APPROACH TO ARC...
 ARCS AND DARCS OF...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES CITED
 
The methods of geoinformatic research can be used to address fundamental questions in the earth sciences. Here, we show the initial application of those methods, using alkaline igneous rocks and carbonatites, to basic questions in (1) igneous petrology and (2) tectonics.

Igneous Petrology
There are currently two hypotheses about the origin of alkaline igneous rocks, such as nepheline syenites and carbonatites: one hypothesis (see, for example, Bell and Tilton, 2002) suggests a source in the convecting mantle (perhaps a plume) (Fig. 1A), and the other hypothesis indicates that (see, for example, Burke et al., 2003) alkaline rocks and carbonatites are derived from partial melting of a part of the underlying mantle lithosphere that includes deformed alkaline rock and carbonatite (Fig. 1B). It is not appropriate in this paper, which focuses on geo-informatics, to get too far into a discussion of the broad petrogenetic implications of the origin of alkaline igneous rocks and carbonatites (ARCs); we confine ourselves to pointing out the broad petrogenetic significance of whether ARCs originate in the mantle lithosphere or in the convecting mantle. If those rocks come from the convecting mantle, there is an implication that reservoirs with distinct chemical and isotopic compositions have remained isolated within the convecting mantle perhaps for periods as long as 3 b.y. If ARCs are derived from source material within the mantle lithosphere, the question arises: In what environment did the first ARC source materials form? Appleyard (1974) suggested that an evaporite source was possible, but as far as we know, the issue has not been revisited in recent years.

Tectonics
There is continuing debate about the extent to which plate-tectonic processes were involved in the evolution of the continental crust and lithosphere during Precambrian times. Where Precambrian suture zones can be identified, marking places in which the Wilson cycle has operated, there is strong evidence that oceans were opening and closing during the evolution of the Precambrian continental lithosphere.

The association of ARCs (nepheline syenites, their volcanic equivalents, tephrites and phonolites, and carbonatites) with intracontinental rift systems has been well established (Bailey, 1974, 1977, 1992) and has lately been confirmed for large parts of Earth in the catalogs of Woolley and his collaborators (Woolley, 1987, 2001, 2001; Kogarko et al., 1995). A new focus is on the deformed alkaline rocks and carbonatites (DARCs) showing gneissic structure, which form <10% of ARCs. ARCs and DARCs are identical in chemistry and petrology but contrast greatly in structure. ARCs form intrusions, usually round and often clearly subvolcanic, but DARCs form concordant lenses often among gneisses and granulites.

Operation of the Wilson cycle has been invoked to reconcile the compositional identity of ARCs and DARCs with their contrasting structure (Fig. 2; Burke et al., 2003). ARCs are interpreted, as is conventional, to have been erupted into intracontinental rifts (Fig. 2A), and DARCs are considered to represent ARCs that have been involved in ocean opening and closing. In the process of ocean opening, ARCs come to lie on a rifted continental margin as a young ocean develops from an intracontinental rift (Fig. 2B). No great changes happen to ARC rocks during ocean opening and as the ocean begins to close (Fig. 2B), but in the final stage of the Wilson cycle, when an island arc or a continent collides with a rifted continental margin, the ARC becomes deformed into a DARC (Fig. 2C). The hypothesis of Burke et al. (2003) predicts that DARCs should be found on suture zones within continents. Those suture zones mark sites of both a rifted continental margin and a later continental collision at that margin.

If DARCs lie on suture zones, then the concentration of ARCs in intracontinental rifts can also be explained. Wilson (1966) showed that rifts commonly develop above existing sutures. ARCs in intracontinental rifts can therefore be interpreted to represent material derived from melting that involved previously formed DARC rocks at a suture zone within the underlying mantle lithosphere (Figs. 1B and 2E).

Testing the Wilson cycle model of ARC and DARC origins has just begun. It has been found to work well in Africa (Fig. 3; Burke et al., 2003) and in India (Fig. 4; Leelanandam et al., 2005). Work on testing the model is also beginning in the Canadian cordillera (Johnston et al., 2003). These studies must be regarded as preliminary, because the model can only be fully tested in a global geoinformatic study. Here, we outline the structure of the geoinformatic work, which we are beginning to address this problem. We include a description of what databases are now available and how we plan to improve them. We illustrate the kinds of results that can be hoped for with an example from the Kola Peninsula of Arctic Russia.


    GEOINFORMATIC APPROACH TO ARC AND DARC DISTRIBUTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOINFORMATIC APPROACH TO ARC...
 ARCS AND DARCS OF...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES CITED
 
Databases
We use three main existing databases. During the course of the study, those databases will be checked, refined, augmented, and modified. The databases are: the Woolley catalogs of alkaline rocks and carbonatites, the world map of rifts, and the world map of sutures.

The Woolley Catalogs of Alkaline Rocks and Carbonatites
The content and structure of the three volumes of this important set of catalogs are described in the following.

Volume 1: Alkaline Rocks and Carbonatites of the World Part 1: North and South America (1987), by Alan R. Woolley; publisher: University of Texas Press (Austin) and British Museum (Natural History), 216 large-format (14 inch x 10 inch) pages.

Complexes discussed are from nineteen countries: Canada, Greenland, Mexico, and the United States (North America); Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela (Central and South America). Discussions of individual alkaline rock occurrences vary greatly but commonly include place names, latitudes and longitudes, petrology, mineralogy, ages (mainly isotopic ages), geological maps of varied detail and scale (redrafted for the catalog), and in some cases economic notes and geophysical information. Canada is one of the most fully treated countries, with 165 localities and ~270 references; a two-page map, showing the locations of all the localities discussed, and 81 localities and regional maps are provided. The United States, another fully treated country, has 144 localities and 67 maps. Greenland has 144 localities and 29 maps. By contrast, for several countries, only one occurrence (e.g., Honduras) to three occurrences (e.g., Uruguay) were cataloged, and there are no detailed maps.

Volume 2: Alkaline Rocks of the World Part 2: Former Soviet Union (1995), by L.N. Kogarko, V.A. Kononova, M.P. Orlova, and A.R. Woolley; publisher: Chapman and Hall, London, 226 pages. The format and coverage is similar to that of Volume 1. Occurrences are described by province; 23 provinces are distinguished and over 400 individual occurrences are described. There are 253 maps, including one map of the whole region, 23 maps showing the provinces, and 229 maps showing individual occurrences. References are numerous; for example, there are over 200 for the Kola-Karelia region. English-language references are distinguished.

Volume 3: Alkaline Rocks and Carbonatites of the World Part 3: Africa (2001), by A. Woolley; publisher: Geological Society (London), 372 pages. The structure of Volume 3 is similar to that of the two previous volumes; 842 alkaline igneous rock complexes are described from occurrences in 40 countries, and 348 maps illustrate those descriptions. About 4% of the occurrences (32) are DARCs, and ~90% of those DARCs (28) lie within known suture zones (Burke et al., 2003).

World Map of Rifts.
Rifts are defined as elongate depressions overlying places where the lithosphere has ruptured in extension. In the interior of plates, away from plate boundaries, the lithosphere is generally in compression (Zoback, 1992). Rifts may form anywhere that extension has locally modified the intraplate stress field. Intracontinental rifts have formed in a variety of tectonic environments (see, for example, Sengör, 1995, his Figure 2.5). Several maps showing the worldwide distribution of intracontinental rifts have been compiled over the past 30 yr (Burke et al., 1977; Sengör, 1995, his Figure 2.2). We use the most up-to-date rift catalog (that of Sengör and Natalin, 2001; Fig. 5) to test the idea that ARCs have been strongly associated with intracontinental rifts during the past 2.5 b.y.

World Map of Sutures.
We use the world map of sutures of Burke et al. (1977), which are clearly in need of updating. For example, the Early Proterozoic suture of the Kola Peninsula (Daly et al., 2001) that we refer to in this paper had not been recognized in 1977.

Procedure
We utilized geoinformatic capabilities for spatial resolution, manipulation, and dissemination of diverse data categories. For selected data sets, we created a geodatabase, which includes structural data and a regional geological map in shape-file format. Our geodatabase is an Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) relational database system that stores small-size geographic data (<2 GB) and acts as a container for storing spatial and attribute data and the relationships that exist among them. In geodata-bases, a vector data format for features and their associated attributes can be structured to work together as an integrated system using rules, relationships, and topological associations. Also, we included remote-sensing and digital elevation data for selected sites as raster images.

Our longer-term plan is to transfer current data and compile more data in a Microsoft SQL Server 2000 version relational database management system (RDBMS) and make this database accessible to the community through the Internet (pending availability of findings). The database system will be integrated with ArcIMS (ARC Internet Map Server) via ArcSDE (ARC Spatial Database Engine). ArcSDE is a geographic information system (GIS) gateway that facilitates management of spatial data in relational database management systems (SQL server in our case), whereas ArcIMS is currently widely utilized in the integration of local GIS data sources with Internet data sources for display, query, and analysis using a Web browser (see Fig. 6). The database will include digital map data sets using the Woolley catalogs (Woolley, 2001, 1987; Kogarko et al., 1995). We will first compile relevant existing geologic map data in various formats (hard copy, digital maps, open-file reports, etc.). Maps will be reprojected to a common standard projection. Geologic map objects will include polygons (e.g., outcrops) and lines (e.g., faults, unconformities). Polygons and lines will have various attributes, for example, polygon attributes include lithology, age, thickness, and unit name, and line attributes include feature types, orientation, and name. We will generate relevant metadata files that are compatible with metadata standards of the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) and National Geologic Map Database (NGMDB) (Lehnert et al., 2000; Ryburn, 1999).We will continue incorporating map data for areas that have not yet been covered in the catalogs. Rift and suture maps will be digitized, and the distribution of ARCs and DARCs will be plotted on them.


    ARCS AND DARCS OF THE KOLA PENINSULA: AN EXAMPLE OF THE LOCAL APPLICATION OF GEOINFORMATIC METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOINFORMATIC APPROACH TO ARC...
 ARCS AND DARCS OF...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES CITED
 
Methodology
The "Former Soviet Union" volume of the Woolley catalog (Kogarko et al., 1995) contains descriptions of ARCs and DARCs of the Kola Peninsula that provide an opportunity for a pilot geoinformatic study.

In step 1, we located ~30 ARCs and 2 DARCs in Kola from the catalog (Kogarko et al., 1995), which gives latitudes and longitudes as well as maps of individual occurrences (Fig. 7). In step 2, a test area around the two main ARCs of Kola (Lovozero and Khibina) was selected. In step 3, a LandsatTM image of the area was acquired. In step 4, maps of the two ARCs and two much smaller DARCs were scanned from the catalog. In step 5, the Landsat image and the scanned maps were projected in the same projection and were imported to ArcGIS and plotted (Fig. 7). The DARC outcrops lie on either side of the area in which the ARCs outcrop. One DARC, Soustova, was shown in the catalog as foliated. That foliation was found to be concordant with the regional gneissic foliation on the Landsat image. A similar, although less obvious, relationship was discerned for the second DARC. In step 6, a literature search showed: (1) that Early Proterozoic rift facies rocks and an ESE-trending Early Proterozoic suture zone have been identified in the neighborhood of the ARCs and DARCs of Figure 7 (Daly et al., 2001), and (2) that a poorly defined ESE-trending rift structure, the Kola aulacogen, has been identified as occupying the region in which the Paleozoic ARC rocks of Kola erupted (Kogarko et al., 1995).

Interpretation of the Kola Data
Daly et al. (2001) used a variety of isotopic systems to establish an Early Proterozoic history of ocean opening and ocean closing in Kola. They distinguished two Archean continental blocks from an intervening belt of rocks with Early Proterozoic ages. The rocks in that intervening belt represent material generated and accreted within and at the margin of an ancient ocean basin. Deformed rift-environment rocks were distinguished within and at the margins of the Archean blocks (Fig. 8).

The Kola DARCs at Soustova and Kurginskii (see Fig. 8) occur (as the Wilson cycle model requires) in proximity to the rifted margin of the northern (present coordinates) side of the Proterozoic ocean. The DARCs also lie close to the suture zone mapped by Daly et al. (2001) that marks the place where that ocean closed (Fig. 8). Our interpretation is that the DARCs acquired their gneissic structure during the collision that closed the Early Proterozoic ocean.

The two largest ARCs in Kola (Lovozero and Khibina) are shown on Figure 8. They are of Devonian age and were erupted into the ESE-trending rift (Kola aulacogen; Kogarko et al., 1995) that formed in response to the Scandian (Early Devonian) continental collision in northern Norway. All the ARCs of the Kola Devonian population were intruded over a short interval ca. 370 Ma (K. Bell, 2005, personal commun.). The location of these ARCs in the Kola aulacogen, which is a Russian word for a rift, confirms that the rift was of the kind formed in response to a continental collision. The type example is the Baikal rift, which formed in response to the Himalayan collision (Molnar and Tapponnier, 1975). The location of Lovozero and Khibina between the two DARCs (Fig. 8) lends support to the ideas: (1) that ARCs erupt into rifts, and (2) that the magma of those ARCs forms by partial melting (specifically decompression melting) of DARCs in the parts of suture zones in which the rifts have developed within the mantle lithosphere (Fig. 8).


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOINFORMATIC APPROACH TO ARC...
 ARCS AND DARCS OF...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES CITED
 
We have outlined the main features of a geo-informatic study, which, when completed, will have accommodated and analyzed the worldwide distribution of ARCs and DARCs. We have also illustrated the application of our methods using the example of the Kola Peninsula of Arctic Russia.

Tests of a Wilson cycle model, which embraces the two hypotheses: (1) DARCs are concentrated in suture zones, and (2) ARCs later erupt into rifts formed on top of those suture zones, have now been carried out for Kola (this paper), Africa (Burke et al., 2003) and India (Leelanandam et al., 2005). Results in these areas: (1) provide evidence in support of the idea that DARCs occupy ancient suture zones and therefore that our understanding of the distribution of DARCs contributes to tectonic understanding by providing evidence of where oceans have opened and closed within continents; (2) provide evidence in support of the idea that the occurrence of ARCs within rifts in close proximity to older DARCs is compatible with the hypothesis that ARCs form from melting involving DARC material in the underlying lithosphere. If it can be resolved whether a mantle lithosphere or a convecting mantle source is involved in the origin of ARCs, it will be a useful contribution to petrogenesis, as well as a contribution to the present, rather confusing discussion of the nature of mantle plumes.


Figure 01
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Cartoons illustrating two current hypotheses about the origin of alkaline rocks and carbonatites (ARCS). A: In the plume model, ARCs are derived from mantle plumes (here defined simply as magma sources of distinctive chemical composition within the convecting mantle). B: In the deformed alkaline rocks and carbonatites (DARC) model, ARCs are derived from melting that involves deformed alkaline rock and carbonatite material that was carried into the lithospheric mantle during an ancient subduction episode.

 


Figure 02
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. A: Cartoon illustrating how alkaline rocks and carbonatites (ARCs) are erupted into intracontinental rifts. B: Cartoon illustrating how those ARCs may come to lie on a rifted continental margin as an ocean develops on the site of the rift. C: Cartoon illustrating how the ARCs from the rifted continental margin may become involved in a continental collision to become deformed alkaline rocks and carbonatites (DARCs). Some of those DARCs are subducted and become part of the continental lithosphere; others remain in the crust. D: An interval of hundreds of millions of years may pass without activity. E: Renewed rifting localized on the ancient suture zone may lead to the eruption of new alkaline igneous rocks and carbonatites by partial melting that involves the DARC sources in the underlying mantle lithosphere.

 


Figure 03
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Deformed alkaline rocks and carbonatites (DARCs) lie on Proterozoic suture zones near the edges of and within (dashed line) African cratons. Younger alkaline igneous rocks and carbonatites, e.g., in Malawi (13°S, 35°E), have erupted in rifts on top of African suture zones (simplified from Burke et al., 2003). If South America is rotated back to its former position adjacent to Africa, the suture zone on the southern border of the West African craton becomes continuous. The only recognized DARC in South America lies on that suture (Woolley, 1987).

 


Figure 04
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Map of India showing the distribution of nearly 50 deformed alkaline rocks and carbonatites (DARCs) within the S-shaped Great Indian Proterozoic fold belt. These DARCs formed from alkaline igneous rock and carbonatites (ARCs) erupted ca. 2.0 Ga into rifts. They became involved in arc and continental collisions between ca. 1.8 and ca. 0.55 Ga (Leelanandam et al., 2005).

 


Figure 05
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. This map shows how Sengör and Natalin (2001) mapped ~700 intracontinental rifts. We use these results and those of world suture maps (Burke et al., 1977) as databases, which we plan to refine in our geoinformatics study of alkaline igneous rock and carbonatite (ARC) and deformed alkaline rock and carbonatite (DARC) distribution. Rectangles labeled Figs. 4 and 5 on this map refer to additional maps in Sengör and Natalin (2001).

 


Figure 06
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. A: Database architecture for alkaline igneous rock and carbonatite (ARC) and deformed alkaline rock and carbonatite (DARC) distribution. The database system will be integrated with ArcIMS (ARC Internet Map Server) via ArcSDE. ArcSDE is a geographic information system (GIS) gateway that facilitates management of spatial data in relational database management systems, whereas ArcIMS is currently widely utilized in the integration of local GIS data sources with Internet data sources for display, query, and analysis using a Web browser. Visualization will be made available through ArcIMS to GEOWALL. B: Flow chart explaining process of making customized maps via Web browser.

 


Figure 07
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Landsat image (bands 7-4-3) of a part of the Kola Peninsula of Russia and (above) maps from Volume 2 of the Woolley catalog of alkaline rocks and carbonatites (Kogarko et al., 1995). In this paper, we report on a pilot study of the area of this image. Kurginskii and Soustova (#15 and #18 on the map) are deformed alkaline rocks and carbonatites (DARCs) of Early Proterozoic age. Lovozero and Khibina (#16 and #17 on the map) are alkaline igneous rocks and carbonatites (ARCs) of Devonian age. Yellow dashed lines are gneissic foliation concordant with that of Soustova. The eruption sites of Lovozero and Khibina are bracketed by the locations of Kurginskii and Soustova. This is consistent with the idea that ARCs may be derived from partial melting involving underlying DARCs.

 


Figure 08
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. Sketch map based on the work of Daly et al. (2001) and Figure 7, showing how the Early Proterozoic Lapland-Kola orogenic belt (LKO; gray) and its sutured boundary (black line) lie between two distinct blocks of Archean rock (green). The deformed alkaline rocks and carbonatites (DARCs) of Kurginskii and Soustova lie within the area in which rift facies rocks related to the opening of an ocean on the site of the LKO have been recognized. The alkaline igneous rocks and carbonatites (ARCs) of Khibina and Lovozero lie within the poorly defined Devonian "Kola aulacogen" (Kogarko et al., 1995), which extends south-southeastward roughly along the trend of the Early Proterozoic suture zone.

 

MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED BY THE SOCIETY July 17, 2005

REVISED MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED October 27, 2005

MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED December 6, 2005


    REFERENCES CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOINFORMATIC APPROACH TO ARC...
 ARCS AND DARCS OF...
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES CITED
 

Appleyard, E.C., 1974, Synorogenic igneous alkaline rocks of eastern Ontario and northern Norway: Lithos, v. 7 p. 147-169 doi: 10.1016/0024-4937(74)90028-0.[CrossRef][GeoRef]

Bailey, D.K., 1974, Continental rifting and alkaline magmatism: in Sorensen, H., ed., The alkaline rocks: New York, Wiley, p. 148-159.

Bailey, D.K., 1977, Lithospheric control of continental rift magmatism: Journal of the Geological Society [London], v. 133 p. 103-106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bailey, D.K., 1992, Episodic alkaline activity across Africa: Implications for the causes of continental break-up, in Storey, B.C., Alabaster, T., and Pankhurst, R.J., eds., Magmatism and the causes of continental break-upJournal of the Geological Society [London], v. 68 p. 91-98.

Bell, K., and Tilton, G.R., 2002, Probing the mantle: The story from carbonatites: Eos (Transactions, American Geophysical Union), v. 83 p. 273-277.

Burke, K., Dewey, J.F., and Kidd, W.S.F., 1977, World distribution of sutures; the sites of former oceans: Tectonophysics, v. 40 p. 69-99 doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(77)90030-0.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Burke, K., Ashwal, L.D., and Webb, S.J., 2003, New way to map old sutures using deformed alkaline rocks and carbonatites: Geology, v. 31 p. 391-394 doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0391:NWTMOS>2.0.CO;2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Daly, J.S., Balagansky, V.V., Timmerman, M.J., White-house, M.J., de Jong, K., Guise, P., Bogdanova, S., Gorbatschev, R., and Bridgwater, D., 2001, Ion micro-probe U-Pb zircon geochronology and isotopic evidence for a transcrustal suture in the Lapland-Kola orogen, northern Fennoscandian Shield: Precambrian Research, v. 105 p. 289-314 doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00116-9.[CrossRef]

Johnston, S.T., Burke, K., Ashwal, L., and Webb, S.J., 2003, Examples of deformed alkaline rocks and carbonatites (DARCs) in suture zones and as sources of alkaline rocks and carbonatites (ARCs) in overlying rifts from the northwestern Cordilleran continental margin and elsewhere: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 35 p. 559.

Kogarko, L.N., Kononova, V.A., Orlova, M.P., and Woolley, A.R., 1995, Alkaline rocks of the world, Part 2: Former Soviet Union: London, Chapman & Hall. 226 p.

Leelanandam, C., Burke, K., Ashwal, L.D., and Webb, S.J., 2005, Proterozoic mountain building in Peninsular India: An analysis based primarily on alkaline rock distribution: Geological Magazine, (in press).

Lehnert, K., Su, Y., Langmuir, C.H., Sarbas, B., and Nohl, U., 2000, A global geochemical database structure for rocks: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, v. 1 doi: 10.1029/1999GC000026.

Molnar, P., and Tapponnier, P., 1975, Cenozoic tectonics of Asia; effects of a continental collision: Science, v. 189 p. 419-426.[Free Full Text]

Ryburn, R.J., 1999, The evolution of geoscientific metadata: Australian Geological Survey Organization Research Newsletter, v. 31 p. 12-13.

Sengör, A.M.C., 1995, Sedimentation and tectonics of fossil rifts: in Ingersoll, R.F., and Busby, C.J., eds., Tectonics of sedimentary basins: Oxford, England, Blackwell Science, p. 53-118.

Sengor, A.M.C., and Natalin, B.A., 2001, Rifts of the world: in Ernst, R.E., and Buchan, K.L., eds., Mantle plumes: Their identification through time: Geological Society of America Special Paper 352, p. 389-482.

Wilson, J.T., 1966, Did the Atlantic close and then re-open?: Nature, v. 211 p. 676-681.[CrossRef][GeoRef]

Woolley, A.R., 1987, Alkaline rocks and carbonatites of the world, Part 1: North and South America: Austin, University of Texas Press, and British Museum of Natural History. 216 p.

Woolley, A.R., 2001, Alkaline rocks and carbonatites of the world, Part 3: Africa: London, Geological Society of London. 372 p.

Zoback, M., 1992, The world stress map project: Journal of Geophysical Research, ser. B, Solid Earth and Planets, v. 8 p. 11703-12013.



This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, K.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America